The national debt clock in New York ticks relentlessly, adding thousands of dollars per second to a number that has now climbed near $39 trillion. It is the figure cited in news reports, debated in Congress, and used to frame nearly every conversation about the country’s fiscal future. According to Kent Smetters, one of the most respected fiscal economists in the United States, it is also deeply incomplete.
The real number, Smetters argues, is closer to $100 trillion.
Two Kinds of Debt
Smetters is not a fringe voice. A former economist at the Congressional Budget Office and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy at the U.S. Treasury, he now directs the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a nonpartisan research tool widely used in Washington to analyze the fiscal impact of federal policy. His argument is not that the official debt figures are falsified. It is that they are incomplete by design.
The $39 trillion counts what Smetters calls explicit obligations: Treasury bonds, bills, and notes that the government is legally required to repay. What it leaves out are the implicit obligations, the future commitments built into Social Security and Medicare. These are not legally enforceable in the same way a bond is, but they are political and moral commitments the government has made to tens of millions of Americans who have spent their working lives paying into both programs.
Those implicit obligations are roughly twice the size of the explicit debt. Penn Wharton’s own research puts the combined total at $103.2 trillion for people alive today. Include obligations to future generations and the number reaches $162.7 trillion. Under standard corporate accounting rules, the country’s debt-to-GDP ratio would not be the reported 100%. It would be closer to 300%.
How the Books Are Kept
Smetters describes the system as a shell game. The term is deliberate. A Ponzi scheme implies criminal deception. What he is describing is something more institutionalized: a set of accounting rules, some dating to 1985, that allow obligations to be moved off the official ledger simply by classifying them as pay-as-you-go liabilities rather than explicit debt. The commitments do not disappear. They just stop being counted.
The clearest example is in how the Congressional Budget Office models Social Security. By law, the CBO must project the program’s costs assuming it will pay full benefits indefinitely, even after its trust fund is exhausted. That trust fund is currently projected to run dry around 2032. At that point, under existing law, benefits would be automatically cut by roughly 16 percent. The CBO is legally prohibited from modeling that scenario, which means the fiscal gap it reports is smaller than the one retirees may actually face.
The practical consequence is a feedback loop of delayed action. The CBO already projects deficits reaching $1.9 trillion in fiscal year 2026, growing to $3.1 trillion by 2036. Those numbers, significant as they are, still undercount the full picture. Each year the implicit liabilities stay hidden is another year policymakers have less reason to act and the ultimate cost of doing so grows.
What the Metals Market Is Signaling
Whether or not Washington updates its accounting, investors and central banks have been drawing their own conclusions. Gold rose more than 65% in 2025, its best annual performance since 1979, crossing $3,000 an ounce for the first time before closing the year above $4,300. Silver gained approximately 144% over the same period, also a 46-year record. Both metals have continued climbing into 2026.
J.P. Morgan has set its year-end 2026 gold price target at $6,300 per ounce, citing persistent demand from central banks and institutional investors, with an upside scenario of $8,000 to $8,500 if household allocations to gold increase modestly from current levels. Central banks alone are projected to purchase around 800 tonnes of gold this year.
The Stakes for Retirement Savings
For savers, and particularly those in or near retirement, the implications of a hidden fiscal gap are not abstract. Sustained deficit spending tends to pressure the purchasing power of the dollar, eroding the real value of fixed-income assets and cash savings over time. The larger the true liability, and the longer it stays unaddressed, the more that pressure builds.
That dynamic helps explain why major financial institutions have begun reclassifying gold and silver. BlackRock, in its 2026 investment outlook, described the metals as no longer purely defensive assets but as structural portfolio components. Morgan Stanley’s chief investment officer went further, suggesting investors reconsider the traditional 60/40 stock-bond allocation in favor of a model that dedicates 20% to precious metals.
The debt clock will keep running. But the number it shows, by Smetters’ reckoning, captures less than half of what the country actually owes. Gold appears to have priced that in. The question is whether the rest of the financial system is ready to do the same.
Sources:
